svenvh accepted this revision.
svenvh added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM!
================
Comment at: clang/docs/UsersManual.rst:3016
.. code-block:: console
----------------
Anastasia wrote:
> svenvh wrote:
> > I wonder if we need to keep this example? You're not referring to it from
> > the text and it's not demonstrating any special flags anymore.
> it's still demonstrating the use of default clang driver invocation i.e.
> there are no flags needed to compile the code that uses BIFs.
Okay, if you want to make that explicit then I would suggest to add a line like:
```The following example shows how an OpenCL program that calls various
standard builtin functions can be compiled without the need for any explicit
includes or compiler flags.```
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96616/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96616
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
