zequanwu added a comment.

In D96832#2569987 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96832#2569987>, @ahatanak wrote:

> In D96832#2569481 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96832#2569481>, @zequanwu wrote:
>
>> In D96832#2568257 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96832#2568257>, @aaron.ballman 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It was explicitly disallowed in the initial patch: 
>>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D12922 and the original author said "I'm still 
>>> trying to figure out the best way to handle c++ virtual functions: this 
>>> attribute is not very useful for someone who is looking for a way to 
>>> reliably prevent tail-call to a virtual function." and "I made this change 
>>> because this attribute isn't useful when the compiler cannot resolve the 
>>> function call statically at compile time and it isn't important for the use 
>>> case I have." Has this situation changed in the backend?
>>
>> Oh, I didn't see that. But when I tested `not_tail_called` on normal 
>> functions,  it seems like not working(https://godbolt.org/z/znr5b5, `f1` is 
>> marked as `not_tail_called`, it still get inlined). Or, I misunderstand how 
>> to use it properly?
>
> I'm still trying to remember the discussions we had, but I think we banned 
> the attribute on virtual functions because you can't in general promise a 
> call to an annotated function won't be tail called if the function is virtual.
>
> This patch doesn't prevent the call to `method` in the code below from being 
> tail called, but I suppose users would except the attribute to prevent the 
> tail call?
>
>   struct B {
>     virtual void method();  
>   };
>   
>   struct D : B {
>     [[clang::not_tail_called]] void method() override; 
>   };
>   
>   void test(D *d) {
>     B *b = D;
>     b->method();
>   }

I got the point about why preventing it on virtual functions. But, on the above 
godbolt link, I provided a example where `not_tail_called` doesn't prevent a 
non-virtual function from tail call. I wonder if I use it correctly.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D96832/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D96832

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to