[STL] > When my work is finished (currently 3132 tests are passing out of 4541), I > expect that > we'll start running libcxx's tests in our automation, which will detect > regressions rapidly and reliably.
[David Blaikie] > It'd be great to have this sort of stuff upstream (in a public facing > buildbot/on LLVM's > community buildbot infrastructure) if that's a possibility - saves you the > hassle of > roundtripping/externalizing your results & let's the community fix things as > they occur. > But I know it can be a pain/expensive/etc to setup infrastructure (I've a GDB > buildbot > that's been down for months because I haven't found the time to bring it all > back online... *shamecube*). It'd certainly be possible for a buildbot to run libcxx's tests against VC 2015 Update 2 (or newer; I'll be checking in fixes for overloaded-comma that libcxx found). I don't know how to set up such infrastructure (it took me a while just to figure out how our internal Perl scripts were running libcxx's tests, and I'm still mystified as to how they're accidentally deleting a dozen algorithm tests when they run). But I'll be happy to contribute the additional chunks I've written (e.g. the force-included header that's defining various macros; although test_macros.h may be the proper place for that stuff to live in the future). STL _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
