dexonsmith added a comment.

In D92808#2556542 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808#2556542>, @fhahn wrote:

> @dexonsmith  @rjmccall What do you think? Would you be happy with iterating 
> on the suggestions in tree?

I don't feel strongly either way; happy for it to land as-is (bugs fixed) and 
iterated on there. One thought is that if the name is going to change it'd be 
nice to have it right for git-blame (today I would vote for 
"clang.arc.attachedcall" but anything a bit more clear would be fine), but of 
course that can change later too.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to