vsavchenko added a comment. In D93630#2554186 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93630#2554186>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D93630#2506604 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93630#2506604>, @aaron.ballman > wrote: > >> In D93630#2504758 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93630#2504758>, @vsavchenko >> wrote: >> >>> I'll clean up the tests! But, unfortunately, I couldn't proceed with GCC >>> folks. I asked around and I'm not allowed to do that (company rules). >> >> Ah, that's unfortunate. When I get the chance, I'll try to send an email to >> the GCC lists. Do you mind if I pass the email by you first (privately) to >> ensure I'm not misstating your goals or anything from your patch? > > I sent the email to the GCC lists > (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-January/234747.html) and there were > no follow-up responses after two weeks. I take the silence to mean there are > no concerns from the GCC side of things, so this patch (finally!) LGTM. Thank > you for sticking through the long process on this one! Yay, thanks! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D93630/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D93630 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
