xazax.hun added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19586#417053, @etienneb wrote:
> The rule also apply for statements in a same compound:
>
> {
> statement1();
> statement2();
> statement3();
>
>
> But this can be a further improvement.
I believe this might be an intentional omission, since this can not imply
semantic problems. But I agree that, this addition makes sense.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19586
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
