tbaeder added a comment. In D96070#2546330 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96070#2546330>, @MaskRay wrote:
> we cannot control `(optional -lc++abi/-lcxxrt/others)`, which is depended by > the installation configuration (e.g. > LIBCXX_STATICALLY_LINK_ABI_IN_STATIC_LIBRARY, or libc++.a as a linker script > (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46321), or .deplibs) and whether you > are specifying --sysroot. Perhaps I had the opportunity to redesign the > matter, I would let `-stdlib=libc++` not affect linker options at all. Users > just should specify `-lc++` and related options by themselves. Right, but at least some of these sound like the can or should be solved in libc++ then. Reading https://reviews.llvm.org/D60794, I thought this was not going to happen and the solution should instead be in clang. What is the ideal solution here? If `-static -stdlib=libc++` is not meant to work, is the working solution documented anywhere that we could link people to? If your blog post isn't official of course :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D96070/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D96070 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
