Anastasia added a comment.

In D78979#2536661 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979#2536661>, @arsenm wrote:

> In D78979#2536590 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979#2536590>, @Anastasia wrote:
>
>> @arsenm I would like to see if we can finalize this patch soon. Do you think 
>> you will have a capacity for this in the next weeks? Otherwise I would be 
>> happy to help too.
>
> I don't think I'll have time soon, you can take over
>
>> It looks in a good shape, we just need to decide if we go ahead with the new 
>> flag you are adding or reuse `-nostdinc`. Do you have any preference 
>> yourself?
>
> Not really sure. No real preference

Thanks, after brainstorming more with other developers I have decided to change 
the direction slightly that I have explained in the RFC:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2021-February/067610.html

I believe this achieves similar goal but it also addresses the long parsing 
speed that has always been a concern for the default header within the OpenCL 
community.

Let me know if you have any feedback and either way we decide to go your patch 
will be a good base point.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to