steakhal added a comment. In D95860#2536721 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95860#2536721>, @balazske wrote:
> In D95860#2536609 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95860#2536609>, @steakhal wrote: > >> Please, also add a regression test for Haoxin Tu's reproducer. >> >> // RUN: %clang %s >> >> // expected warning.... >> volatile long a ( a .~b > > What about the already added test? Oh sorry, I was tricked by that the analyzer is enabled. We would crash even without the analyzer, so pushing this test under the Analysis seems unnecessary to me. BTW, the analysis expects a compiler-error-free program. This shouldn't compile. This is not related to analysis in any way. The alpha.clone.CloneChecker reproducer however, crashes at the end of the analysis when it tries to emit the diagnostics. IMO that should be in the `Analysis`, the current one should be where frontend tests are. IMO we should have tests for both of these. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95860/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95860 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
