EricWF added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19698#416315, @rsmith wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19698#416309, @EricWF wrote: > > > Most tests pretty much rely on <type_traits> getting dragged in indirectly, > > same thing with <memory> and the bits of <utility> we actually define in > > <type_traits>. > > > There are also a few symbols that libc++ defines in the wrong header and then > #includes into the right one. Any automated fix is going to mess up on those. Ah, I stupidly assumed that the automatic fix would handle "std::" symbols based off of the spec and not the implementation. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19698 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits