EricWF added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19698#416315, @rsmith wrote:

> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19698#416309, @EricWF wrote:
>
> > Most tests pretty much rely on <type_traits> getting dragged in indirectly, 
> > same thing with <memory> and the bits of <utility> we actually define in 
> > <type_traits>.
>
>
> There are also a few symbols that libc++ defines in the wrong header and then 
> #includes into the right one. Any automated fix is going to mess up on those.


Ah, I stupidly assumed that the automatic fix would handle "std::" symbols 
based off of the spec and not the implementation.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D19698



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to