rjmccall added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19678#416059, @hfinkel wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19678#415844, @rjmccall wrote: > > > I see what you're going for with "listing file", but I like ICC's option > > name much better, or at least something along those lines. > > > Sounds good to me. Do you have a preference on -fopt-report vs. > -foptimization-report vs. something else? Do you have an opinion on the > default file-name extension for the report? Maybe I should name it > .opt-report (or something like that)? I don't think we have a consistent abbreviation for that anywhere else in the options (other than -O, I guess), so my inclination would be to spell it out as -foptimization-report. The extension is just appended to the original filename, so that it ends up something like foo.cpp.opt-report? I don't have an objection to ".opt-report" or even ".lst". http://reviews.llvm.org/D19678 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
