ctetreau added a comment. In D95635#2528851 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95635#2528851>, @JDevlieghere wrote:
>> However, the project claims to require 3.6 or greater, and 3.6 features are >> being used. > > Can you link to where it says that? I'm not opposed to making 3.6 the > minimally required version, but at least for LLDB we don't have that > requirement and we have documentation mentioning Python 3.5. In D95635#2528883 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95635#2528883>, @yln wrote: > In D95635#2528851 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95635#2528851>, @JDevlieghere > wrote: > >>> However, the project claims to require 3.6 or greater, and 3.6 features are >>> being used. >> >> Can you link to where it says that? I'm not opposed to making 3.6 the >> minimally required version, but at least for LLDB we don't have that >> requirement and we have documentation mentioning Python 3.5. > > For LLVM: https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#software This is where I saw it. I got bit by @yln's cleanup patch. I can reduce the minimum version for LLDB if that's the officially required version, but llvm at the very least advertises 3.6 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95635/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95635 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
