jeroen.dobbelaere added a comment. In D93040#2517769 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93040#2517769>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> In D93040#2517758 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93040#2517758>, @xbolva00 wrote: > >> http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=344afa853fcfcc085cb5c957b4a07c7ea013bb1b&to=2b9a834c43cb1f93d33958c14b695896bb4e9c1e&stat=size-text >> >> Codesize regression 1% for tramp3d. Can you check it? > > I assume this to be a secondary effect of having the instructions in the > first place. Maybe some unroll or inline size threshold needs to be thought > about them. At the end of the day, we might not be able to avoid something > like this as we make `!noalias` correct, though, I imagine the threshold > theory which can be resolved. The loop unrolling/rotating and the cleanup patches are not yet committed. You can see the effect of those here: http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=344afa853fcfcc085cb5c957b4a07c7ea013bb1b&to=eaf871f4e7fde26cd755cc4c2d67f2c244c66f18&stat=size-text Also see D95141 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95141> for links to more results. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D93040/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D93040 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
