simoncook added a comment. In D94403#2504046 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94403#2504046>, @kito-cheng wrote:
> Thanks you implement that on clang, I think it's really great to included > that in LLVM 12 release. > > I would like to define marco for sub-extension too, I know that's my fault, I > didn't specify the behavior of sub-extension clearly on the spec, but I think > it would be great if we also define sub-extension marcos, since it would be > easier to check when some core only implement sub-extension, and the code can > just check the sub-extensio rather than check both. That's no problem, I'll extend to cover sub-extensions before landing. I notice the zvamo/zvlsseg extensions aren't yet accepted by the -march flag, so I will put a patch together for those and likely land those together. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D94403/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D94403 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
