aaron.ballman added a comment.
Could you give me a bit more background about why you want to make this change?
There are tests which I would expect to match in any traversal mode (e.g.,
`EXPECT_TRUE(matches("class X {};", traverse(TK_AsIs, HasClassX)));`) so
there's a part of me that wonders if we should add helper functionality to test
the various traversal modes as part of this change. e.g., we specify an
explicit traversal mode for the situations where only one mode should be
tested, and we specify a helper function that tests both traversal modes on the
same code. WDYT?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93988/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93988
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
