steveire added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h:118 + /// behavior of clang-tidy. + virtual llvm::Optional<ast_type_traits::TraversalKind> + getCheckTraversalKind() const; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > steveire wrote: > > sammccall wrote: > > > I don't really get why this would be optional. > > > A check's implementation isn't really going to be robust to "whatever the > > > default is", it's going to be tested against one or the other. > > > So None isn't really a sensible return value - can't the base class > > > simply return the actual default? > > ASTMatchFinder doesn't know the ASTContext, so it can't access the default. > > That's why I made it an optional. > The fact that it's optional is a bit weird. Given that this is a temporary > API, I see two approaches: hold our nose because the ugliness shouldn't be > long-lived, or have the default be specified in two places with comments > saying "don't forget to update over here if you change this value" so we can > get rid of the `Optional<>` here. WDYT? My preference is to keep the optional. Having multiple places to update makes it likely they'll get out of sync. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80623/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80623 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
