hliao added a comment. Beyond the enabling of the compilation with `<complex>` on Windows, I really have the concern on the current approach supporting `<complex>` compilation in the device compilation. The device compilation should not relies on the host STL implementation. That results in inconsistent compilation results across various platforms, especially Linux vs. Windows. BTW, the use of `<complex>` in CUDA cannot be compiled with NVCC directly even with `--expt-relaxed-constexpr`, c.f. https://godbolt.org/z/3f79co
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D93638/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D93638 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
