rjmccall added a comment. In D92361#2459513 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92361#2459513>, @zoecarver wrote:
>> I think that as long as the class leaves a copy/move constructor defaulted, >> there's no need for a new trivial_abi attribute. > > Sorry, I'm not sure I follow. Could you elaborate a bit or provide an > example? What do you mean by "new" trivial_abi attribute? Sorry, I mean that I think Akira's example should be passed directly. It shouldn't require its own trivial_abi attribute in order to get the treatment. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D92361/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D92361 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
