bader added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18369#409011, @yaxunl wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18369#408773, @bader wrote: > > > BTW, there is a comment on GitHub that opencl.h might be a bad name for > > that header, since Khronos group provides the header with the same name, > > but it defines host API. So if some developer is using clang to compile > > OpenCL application it might accidentally include opencl.h provided with > > Clang instead of opencl.h with OpenCL host API. > > > Right. We'd better come up with another name. How about opencl-c.h? Sounds good to me. http://reviews.llvm.org/D18369 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
