rjmccall added a comment. This seems like a good change, but we should make sure we test cases that may previously have been covered by the implicit deletion of all copy/move constructors. That may just be a matter of auditing tests.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td:2986 purpose of calls. -A class annotated with ``trivial_abi`` can have non-trivial destructors or -copy/move constructors without automatically becoming non-trivial for the -purposes of calls. For example: +A class annotated with trivial_abi can have non-trivial destructors or copy/move +constructors or deleted move and copy constructors without automatically ---------------- zoecarver wrote: > I need to add back the back-ticks. This also needs to be turned into a comma-separated list now that it has three clauses. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D92361/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D92361 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
