Paul-C-Anagnostopoulos added a comment.

Yes, we could create !codeconcat instead, along with !codeinterleave, !codeeq, 
etc. We could also just extend the existing bang operators to work on the code 
type. I thought it was cleaner just to get rid of the distinction.

I agree that !subst is a mess, even without this change. My plan is eventually 
to implement a saner !replace. But I'm not sure why doing string replacement in 
code is sad.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D92269/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D92269

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to