svenvh added a comment. In D92004#2413603 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92004#2413603>, @Anastasia wrote:
> @svenvh I imagine the testing functionality between the two headers will be > identical? Mostly, assuming you intend to test in the conventional way of feeding a .cl file to Clang. Although currently `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` only provides a subset of the builtins in `opencl-c.h`. In the past I did have a look at the possibility of automated equivalence checking of declarations provided by both `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` and `opencl-c.h`. It shouldn't be impossible, but it's not trivial (one reason being that gentype-expansion is currently done in Sema). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D92004/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D92004 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
