yrouban added a comment.

In D91327#2408521 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91327#2408521>, @kuhar wrote:

> Looks fine to me, but I'm not confident enough to give an approval.

Thanks. I'm working closely with @skatkov and believe he have enough expertise 
to review fully.
The biggest issue with the current design is that we have to send FAM to the 
initialization of StandardInstrumentations/PreservedCFGCheckerInstrumentation. 
This looks asymmetric to the other analysis managers and it would be more 
reasonable to send FAM or all AMs to the instrumentation callbacks as 
parameters.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91327/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91327

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to