MaskRay added a comment. In D91760#2406650 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91760#2406650>, @joerg wrote:
> I have no problem with the change, but please adjust the description to take > about -funwind-tables. I don't think we do async by default, at least not by > design. AFAICT we don't make distinction of -funwind-tables and -fasynchronous-unwind-tables. I think the thing llvm implements is -fasynchronous-unwind-tables. What is the difference of -funwind-tables? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D91760/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D91760 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
