tejohnson added a comment.

In D91410#2401751 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91410#2401751>, @OikawaKirie wrote:

> In D91410#2400018 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91410#2400018>, @tejohnson wrote:
>
>> 
>
>
>
>> ... the new checking is a mix of assert and fatal errors. Is that intended?
>
> No. The added checks are based on the checks on other calls to the 
> `Target::createXXX` functions in this file or other related files. If there 
> are any fatal errors nearby (e.g. llvm/lib/LTO/ThinLTOCodeGenerator.cpp:581 
> vs 569), the check will be a  fatal error; and if there are any assertions 
> (e.g. llvm/lib/CodeGen/LLVMTargetMachine.cpp:43,45,52 vs 60) or the calls are 
> never checked (e.g. llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp:300), the 
> added check will be an assertion.
>
>> If these are not likely due to user input issues, then perhaps they should 
>> all be assert so that they are compiled out in release compilers?
>
> Since all these problems are reported by my static analyzer, I do not really 
> know whether these checked pointers will actually be null when the code is 
> executed. And I did not try to dynamically execute the program to check the 
> problems either. But chances are that if the creator callbacks are not 
> properly set or the called creator functions returns nullptr, the problem 
> will happen. In my opinion, these problems may only happen during 
> development. Therefore, I believe asserts can be sufficient to diagnose the 
> problems.
>
> If you think it would be better to use assertions instead of fatal errors, I 
> will make an update on all `llvm/lib/xxx` files (or maybe all files). But 
> before that, I'd prefer waiting for the replies from other reviewers on the 
> remaining parts of the patch and making an update for all the suggestions.

Sure that sounds good. (Otherwise the llvm/lib parts LGTM)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91410/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91410

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to