abidh added a comment. In D91442#2399200 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91442#2399200>, @lenary wrote:
> I'm worried about this change - I *think* it doesn't cover the existing > behaviour of a baremetal GCC toolchain being installed into the same prefix > as clang, and clang automatically picking up that baremetal gcc toolchain. > What should we expect to do here? This is especially an issue if you're > trying to make a relocatable toolchain tarball, where specifying > `--gcc-toolchain` automatically is difficult. Would it be possible to use a relative path with --gcc-toolchain then this can be checked in either RISCVToolChain.cpp or GNU.cpp and adjusted accordingly? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D91442/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D91442 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
