tra added a comment. In D90174#2387518 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174#2387518>, @scanon wrote:
> Strictly speaking, fp-contract=fast probably should have been a separate flag > entirely (since there's no _expression_ being contracted in fast). > Unfortunately, that ship has sailed, and it does constrain our ability to > choose an accurate name somewhat. > > What if we just spell it out? fast-respect-pragma? fast-when-unspecified? I > don't think that we really need to try to be as brief as possible with this > one. This sounds reasonable. We already have `-fhonor-nans` and `-fhonor-infinities`. Should we make it `fast-honor-pragma` for consistency? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
