aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h:2859
+AST_MATCHER_P(CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, hasMemberName, std::string, N) {
+ return Node.getMember().getAsString() == N;
+}
----------------
steveire wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > This will allow users to match on members that don't have identifiers -- is
> > that intentional? If not, my recommendation is to use something like:
> > ```
> > if (const IdentifierInfo *II = Node.getMember().getAsIdentifierInfo())
> > return II->isStr(N);
> > return false;
> > ```
> > Either way, we should document and test what the expected behavior is for
> > things like constructors/destructors, overloaded operators, and the likes.
> > (But we don't have to test every kind of odd declaration name.)
> I was not able to demonstrate the problem with a test:
> https://godbolt.org/z/3Grd1b
>
> Can you be more specific?
I was thinking of something along these lines: https://godbolt.org/z/K8serj
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90767/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90767
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
