nickdesaulniers added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.h:60
   enum GCMode { NonGC, GCOnly, HybridGC };
-  enum StackProtectorMode { SSPOff, SSPOn, SSPStrong, SSPReq };
+  enum StackProtectorMode { SSPOff, SSPOn, SSPStrong, SSPReq, SSPUnspecified };
 
----------------
void wrote:
> I don't know if it's a convention, but an unspecified enum is typically put 
> at the beginning of the enum list.
This ordering produces the least amount of churn. If I change the ordering, 
then all of the enum values need to be incremented across all unit tests that 
specify `-stack-protector <N>` to `cc1`.  It would simplify the use of 
`std::max` in `RenderSSPOptions` slightly.  WDYT?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D90194/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D90194

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to