alexfh added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19144#402853, @sbenza wrote:
> I think the bug is coming from `memoizedMatchesAncestorOfRecursively`. > `memoizedMatchesRecursively` has a special case at the top to skip the cache > if the node is not sortable. The other function should do that too. > Although the check is stale also because it is only checking for > memoizationData and not whether the node itself works for < and ==. > > Note that adding TemplateArgument to the function is ok, but that won't fix > the bug because we still have other nodes that are not comparable. With this I would be entering "I have no idea what I'm doing" land ;) Might make sense for you to take over the patch, if you know how to fix the issue. WDYT? http://reviews.llvm.org/D19144 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
