steveire added a comment.

> ! In D80499#2353187 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80499#2353187>, @alexfh wrote:
>  You should be ready for back and forth with this change, if users hit 
> widespread issues not caught by tests. Maybe splitting it into separate 
> pieces and involving check authors where practical may be reasonable.

Ok, I'll do that when https://reviews.llvm.org/D80961 and 
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82278 are merged.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D80499/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D80499

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D80499: Remove obsol... Stephen Kelly via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to