ASDenysPetrov added a comment.
Who can confirm if this is correct or somewhere it needs fixes? Here is a
generated result of `evalCast` from the origin branch(before the patch):
void foo(int* x, // &SymRegion{reg_$0<int * x>}
int** y, // &SymRegion{reg_$0<int ** y>}
int***z) // &SymRegion{reg_$0<int *** z>}
{
(void*)x; // &SymRegion{reg_$0<int * x>}
(void*)y; // &SymRegion{reg_$0<int ** y>}
(void*)z; // &SymRegion{reg_$0<int *** z>}
(void**)x; // &Element{SymRegion{reg_$0<int * x>},0 S64b,void *}
(void**)y; // &SymRegion{reg_$0<int ** y>}
(void**)z; // &SymRegion{reg_$2<int *** z>}
(void***)x; // &Element{SymRegion{reg_$0<int * x>},0 S64b,void **}
(void***)y; // &Element{SymRegion{reg_$1<int ** y>},0 S64b,void **}
(void***)z; // &SymRegion{reg_$2<int *** z>}
(void****)x; // &Element{SymRegion{reg_$0<int * x>},0 S64b,void ***}
(void****)y; // &Element{SymRegion{reg_$1<int ** y>},0 S64b,void ***}
(void****)z; // &Element{SymRegion{reg_$2<int *** z>},0 S64b,void ***}
}
@martong
> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/explicit_cast
> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/implicit_conversion
Thanks for the links.
@steakhal
> By the same token, I think you should run the test-suite using the Z3
> refutation and/or Z3 constraint solver to check if this introduces any
> regression.
Never worked with Z3 before. I'll try.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90157/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90157
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
