rmaprath added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11781#403343, @theraven wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11781#403335, @rmaprath wrote: > > > For us (ARM), a threads porting layer is important on several RTOSes (where > > a full-blown pthreads implementations is not available). I will see if I > > can publish one of those porting layer implementations, but perhaps a > > windows porting layer is more interesting to the community, in which case > > I'll look into hacking one up (unless of course, if @espositofulvio has > > already got one). > > > I'd be equally interested (and willing to review) an mbed implementation. Thanks! If you meant the mbed OS [1], I think it is still single-threaded (although that might change in the near future [2]). Most of our customers (of armclang) have proprietary RTOSes, but we might be able upstream a sample implementation (I'm thinking Keil RTX [3], but need to double check a few things), if it seems generally useful to the community. Cheers, / Asiri [1] https://www.mbed.com/ [2] https://www.mbed.com/en/development/software/mbed-os/ ("...we intend to re-introduce it in 2016") [3] http://www.keil.com/rl-arm/kernel.asp Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D11781 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
