Prazek added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19165#402657, @aaron.ballman wrote:

> This strikes me as something the compiler should diagnose instead of a 
> clang-tidy check. Incrementing a bool has been deprecated for some time, but 
> it is outright removed in C++17, so I think giving users a migration path as 
> part of the compiler would be far more beneficial. What do you think?


clang already warns about it, but I don't think it has good fixits.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D19165



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to