hokein added a comment. In D88640#2339349 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88640#2339349>, @rupprecht wrote:
> It looks like this fix caused a different regression in not accepting > `name.<x>.h` as the main header for `name.<x>.cc`, e.g.: > > $ cat /tmp/foo.bar.cc > #include "a.h" > #include "z.h" > #include "foo.bar.h" > > $ clang-format /tmp/foo.bar.cc # Before > #include "foo.bar.h" > > #include "a.h" > #include "z.h" > > $ clang-format /tmp/foo.bar.cc # After > #include "a.h" > #include "foo.bar.h" > #include "z.h" oh, sorry for the regression. Will try to fix that, thanks for the example! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88640/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88640 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits