mstorsjo added a comment. In D89702#2339716 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89702#2339716>, @rnk wrote:
> lgtm > > We need to invent spellings for /MD /MT for the GCC-style driver if we want > it to be usable in the MSVC environment. I don't think there's a precise > translation to the `-static-*` family of options, unless I'm mistaken. Yeah I don't think there's any good match in existing GCC-style options. I guess the most appropriate in such a case would be to use `-nostdlib` or something such, and explicitly mention `msvcrt.lib` and `oldnames.lib`. (If compiling with the GCC-style driver but linking by invoking (lld-)link directly, that's essentially what one has to do anyway.) In D89702#2339719 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89702#2339719>, @amccarth wrote: > It seems weird that we're implicitly adding `defaultlib` options without > checking if the user specified `nodefaultlib`. But given that's already the > case, I don't see a big problem with also adding oldnames.lib. Well we do check for the `-nostdlib` and `-nostartupfiles` options - I guess making it react to `-nodefaultlibs` also could be considered sensible - as an orthogonal change to this one. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D89702/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D89702 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
