scanon added a comment. I guess the counterargument here would be that `.x` does not produce an extvector(1), and there is at least a plausible argument that `.x` should be the same as `.lo` for a two-element vector. I'm not really convinced by this, but it's not totally outrageous.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D89699/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D89699 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
