t-tye added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/docs/AMDGPUUsage.rst:280
names.
+ ``gfx1032`` ``amdgcn`` dGPU - xnack
*TBA*
+ [off]
----------------
foad wrote:
> xnack looks like a mistake here?
gfx1032 does not support XNACK. It should have the same target features as
gfx1032.
================
Comment at: llvm/docs/AMDGPUUsage.rst:835
+ ``EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_GFX1032`` 0x038 ``gfx1032``
*reserved* 0x038 Reserved.
*reserved* 0x039 Reserved.
----------------
Delete as the line above is using this reserved number.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89487/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89487
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
