scott.linder added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Basic/Targets/NVPTX.h:47
     -1, // Default, opencl_private or opencl_generic - not defined
-    5,  // opencl_global
+    -1, // opencl_global
     -1,
----------------
Does anyone have any thoughts on this change specifically? Is someone more 
familiar with NVPTX willing to weigh in on whether it makes more sense to carry 
the address space throughout the compiler explicitly and "drop" it late in the 
DWARF emission, or to do what I did in the current patch (drop it early).

I would lean towards updating the patch to do the latter, but I wanted to get 
feedback before plunging off to do it.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D88976/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D88976

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to