On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 22:01, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Vitaly! > > Let's have them there for at least 24 hours, shall we? > We can do that. > > Could you move sanitizer-buildbot1, sanitizer-buildbot3, > sanitizer-buildbot7 as well, please? > Done. > AnnotatedCommand on the staging has been tested functionally and is good. > My only concern at this point is how it would handle a heavy load, so the > more bots we will have on the staging the better. > > If somebody else could move their AnnotatedCommand bots to the staging > area, that would be much appreciated. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:45 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: > >> Looks like staging AnnotatedCommand fixed step statuses, so we can see >> which one is green. >> Please let me know when to switch bots back from the staging. >> Thank you! >> >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 21:38, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same >>> script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>> >>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should >>>> be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build >>>> bot. >>>> >>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>>> >>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Galina >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>>> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>> >>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it >>>>>> will need more love and care. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>>>>> AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >>>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use >>>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >>>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>> buildbot >>>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >>>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the >>>>> script. >>>>> >>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need >>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
