rsmith added a comment. In D77491#2300013 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77491#2300013>, @rjmccall wrote:
> Being permissive about recognizing builtins when the expected signature > requires a type that lookup can't find seems completely reasonable. We don't > really want to force library functions to take the custom-typechecking path > just because we want to infer an attribute for them. Proposed fix in https://reviews.llvm.org/D88518. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77491/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77491 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
