lebedev.ri added a comment. In D87972#2294488 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87972#2294488>, @xbolva00 wrote:
>>> Does that sound reasonable? > > Yes IMHO. > >>> What are the next suggested steps? > > It would be great to isolate and check the cases which regressed a bit. I've rerun my benchmark, and while the results are still the same (runtime geomean -0.53%/-0.40%, but that obviously depends on the benchmarks), there are some obvious outliers: F13059172: image.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F13059172> F13059175: rsbench.txt <https://reviews.llvm.org/F13059175> I'll try to take a look at that, assuming it's not noise. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87972/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87972 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
