sammccall added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def:153 COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT(RecoveryASTType, 1, 0, "Preserve the type in recovery expressions") +COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT(CDependence, 1, 0, "Build dependent AST nodes in C for better error recovery") ---------------- Why is this not just the RecoveryAST flag? Is there some use of dependence outside the error-handling path? If the language is C, recovery-AST only works if this flag is on too. So they might as well always have the same value. If the language is C++, this flag is meaningless, right? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D84226/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D84226 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
