snehasish marked 3 inline comments as done. snehasish added a comment. Thanks for the quick review @MaskRay, PTAL.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp:4892 + } else { + D.Diag(diag::warn_drv_unsupported_opt_for_target) + << A->getAsString(Args) << TripleStr; ---------------- MaskRay wrote: > This should be an error Sure, can you provide a reference/guidance for when err vs warn is appropriate for driver checks? Most of the code in this file uses err but there are some cases of warn being used. ================ Comment at: clang/test/Driver/fbasic-block-sections.c:5 +// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-linux-gnu -fbasic-block-sections=labels %s -S 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OPT-LABELS %s +// RUN: %clang -### -target arm-unknown-linux -fbasic-block-sections=all %s -S 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-TRIPLE %s +// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fbasic-block-sections=all %s -S 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-TRIPLE %s ---------------- MaskRay wrote: > `%clang -###` -> `not %clang -fsyntax-only` What I really want to check for is the absence of the flag for the particular triple. Using -fsyntax-only means that the cc1 args are not emitted. I've added a check for the diagnostic message but retained `-###` so that I can keep the check for the absence of `-fbasic-block-sections=all`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87426/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87426 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits