aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/docs/Toolchain.rst:289
+
+C standard library implementations that do not guarantee these properties are
+incompatible with Clang and LLVM (and with several other major compilers).
----------------
While I think it's good that we're documenting this, it is really troubling 
that Clang community's perspective is "we can't work with a conforming C 
standard library" without filing any DRs to WG14 about why we cannot conform, 
especially if other major compilers are in a similar boat. Do you have any 
interest in filing a DR to see if we can change the C standard?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D86993: D... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... John McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... John McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D869... Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to