efriedma added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.cpp:350
       return A->getValue();
+    if (T.getArch() == llvm::Triple::sparc && T.isOSSolaris())
+      return "v9";
----------------
ro wrote:
> brad wrote:
> > ro wrote:
> > > efriedma wrote:
> > > > Do we want to make sparc and sparcel behave differently here?
> > > The only thing about little-endian SPARC is that UltraSPARC CPUs can be 
> > > run in little-endian  mode, presumably to ease a Windows NT port that 
> > > never materialized.
> > > 
> > > I could barely find any info on sparcel: the triplet isn't in 
> > > `config.guess`, there's very little else about such CPUs and certainly no 
> > > specification or even an ABI. That's why I tend to leave sparcel-specific 
> > > code alone unless someone who knows these beasts tells me otherwise.
> > > 
> > > What I can say for certain that Solaris never ran on little-endian SPARC.
> > "The Sparcle is an experimental 32-bit microprocessor chip developed in 
> > 1992 by a consortium of MIT, LSI Corporation, and Sun Microsystems. It was 
> > an evolution Sun's SPARC RISC architecture with features geared towards 
> > "large-scale multiprocessing".[1] The chip was manufactured by LSI."
> > 
> > https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~kubitron/cs252/handouts/papers/sparcle-micro-final.pdf
> > 
> > From what little I can find I believe this prototype CPU / system was based 
> > on Linux.
> Ah, thanks.  So this predates Solaris 2.0 (also released in 1992). But even 
> if not, current Solaris 11 is SPARC V9-only.
> 
> However, if this is the only implementation, this bears the question why 
> support for such an experimental CPU almost 30 years old still lives in LLVM. 
>  It comes with a cost, if only for reasoning what needs and needs not to be 
> done to the V8el code.
The sparcv9 manual says the CPU has a little-endian mode; I assume that means 
all sparcv9 chips support it.  If nobody actually does that in practice, 
though, we should drop the sparcel target.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86621/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86621

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to