efriedma added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.cpp:350 return A->getValue(); + if (T.getArch() == llvm::Triple::sparc && T.isOSSolaris()) + return "v9"; ---------------- ro wrote: > brad wrote: > > ro wrote: > > > efriedma wrote: > > > > Do we want to make sparc and sparcel behave differently here? > > > The only thing about little-endian SPARC is that UltraSPARC CPUs can be > > > run in little-endian mode, presumably to ease a Windows NT port that > > > never materialized. > > > > > > I could barely find any info on sparcel: the triplet isn't in > > > `config.guess`, there's very little else about such CPUs and certainly no > > > specification or even an ABI. That's why I tend to leave sparcel-specific > > > code alone unless someone who knows these beasts tells me otherwise. > > > > > > What I can say for certain that Solaris never ran on little-endian SPARC. > > "The Sparcle is an experimental 32-bit microprocessor chip developed in > > 1992 by a consortium of MIT, LSI Corporation, and Sun Microsystems. It was > > an evolution Sun's SPARC RISC architecture with features geared towards > > "large-scale multiprocessing".[1] The chip was manufactured by LSI." > > > > https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~kubitron/cs252/handouts/papers/sparcle-micro-final.pdf > > > > From what little I can find I believe this prototype CPU / system was based > > on Linux. > Ah, thanks. So this predates Solaris 2.0 (also released in 1992). But even > if not, current Solaris 11 is SPARC V9-only. > > However, if this is the only implementation, this bears the question why > support for such an experimental CPU almost 30 years old still lives in LLVM. > It comes with a cost, if only for reasoning what needs and needs not to be > done to the V8el code. The sparcv9 manual says the CPU has a little-endian mode; I assume that means all sparcv9 chips support it. If nobody actually does that in practice, though, we should drop the sparcel target. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86621/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86621 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits