martong added a comment. In D86465#2238379 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465#2238379>, @vsavchenko wrote:
> Here are some benchmarking results. > In docker: > F12777445: tiny.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777445> > F12777444: small.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777444> > Natively on my Mac (no memory measurements due to this issue > <https://github.com/giampaolo/psutil/issues/1791> during `psutil` > installation): > F12777471: tiny-native.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777471> > F12777472: small-native.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777472> These are really promising figures, nice work! (And the measurement stuff itself is also a great addition, thanks for that!) Not that it would matter much, but I was just wondering why there is a slightly bigger memory usage in some of the `docker/small` projects? The most conspicuous is `oatpp`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
