lenary added a comment. In D84414#2234327 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84414#2234327>, @pcc wrote:
> FWIW, on aarch64 we decided to make `-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack` require > the x18 reservation (instead of implying it) to try to avoid ABI mismatch > problems. That is, it should be safe to mix and match code compiled with and > without `-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack`. If we make > `-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack` imply the x18 reservation, it makes it more > likely that someone will accidentally build and link in incompatible code > that does not reserve x18. Ok, that approach does also make sense. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D84414/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D84414 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
