martong added a comment. In D86295#2233068 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86295#2233068>, @martong wrote:
> In D86295#2232005 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86295#2232005>, @steakhal wrote: > >> In D86295#2231760 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86295#2231760>, @NoQ wrote: >> >>> I mean, like, you can measure the entire process with `time` or something >>> like that. I believe @vsavchenko's docker thingy already knows how to do >>> that. >> >> I tried to measure this with `time`, without much luck: >> F12735724: time-verbose-results.txt <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12735724> >> >>> What i'm trying to say is that for almost every region //R// it's a trivial >>> O(1) operation that yields `RegionOffset` (//R//, +0). It is only >>> non-trivial for non-base regions like `FieldRegion` or `ElementRegion` or, >>> well, `CXXBaseObjectRegion`. >> >> What should be my next step? > > Can we see any improvements in CPU counters (Linux)? > > # Detailed CPU counter statistics (includes extras) for the specified > command: > perf stat -d command I am hoping to see a decrease in L1 <https://reviews.llvm.org/L1>-dcache-load-misses ... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86295/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86295 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
