andreybokhanko added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18596#392341, @majnemer wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18596#392098, @andreybokhanko wrote: > > > Do we want to do this for an ignored qualifier? I don't see any practical > > purpose. > > > It's not ignored for Windows on ARM. Hmmm... MS documentation <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177389.aspx> explicitly mentions IPF only: > When you declare a pointer with the __unaligned modifier, the compiler > assumes that the pointer addresses data that is not aligned. Consequently, > for an application that targets an Itanium Processor Family (IPF) computer, > the compiler generates code that reads the unaligned data one byte at a time. OK, I will implement _unaligned as a qualifier, if you think this is the right way to go. Note, though, that it will remain ignored, as there is no support for _unaligned in LLVM IR. Andrey http://reviews.llvm.org/D18596 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
